For students in Northland (Years 9 - 13) who are passionate about and excel in Science and Technology.
Choosing a Category
There are three main categories available for entry at the Central Northland Science and Technology Fair. The categories are Science Investigation, Information Research and Technology.
It is important that the correct category is selected. Selection of the correct category demonstrates a certain degree of scientific knowledge, but more importantly exhibits which are place in the wrong category will be disadvantaged.
Exhibits cannot be moved to other categories on the day and the judges will need to mark for their respective categories. An outstanding investigation project for example will perform poorly in a technology category – it won’t deliver what it takes to win the technology prize, the requirements are different. If you are not sure which category to choose, then ask your teacher. If you are still not sure which category an exhibit should be entered for, see the Judging Criteria below. The quick and dirty answer is:
If it included an experiment, then it is an Investigation.
If it involved finding out about a topic, then it is Research.
If it has a mockup, model or prototype, then it is Technology.
Each exhibit may be entered by one or two students, an exhibit presented by three or more students will not be accepted.
Scientific Investigation
This is a scientific investigation of a chosen topic using fair testing methodology to discover a result and draw conclusions.
The exhibit needs to cover:
Aim – what is the investigation trying to achieve?
Variables – independent, dependent and constant factors of the investigation
Hypothesis – what does the student expect to find coupled with a scientifically based justification?
Method – written record of the experiment steps.
Diagrams – of experiments and equipment used
Unit of measure – how have results been recorded?
Results – using words and graphing
Conclusion – directly linked to the results thereby proving or disproving the hypothesis
Problem – an identified problem the student will attempt to solve.
Possible solutions – identification of a number of solutions that could be attempted.
Market Research – what is already available in the market place to solve the problem? How is the student improving upon that?
Opportunity – an identified solution pathway the student will pursue to production of a prototype model
Design brief – specifications for production of the prototype model including diagrams
Production materials – identified materials used in the production process with consideration of such things as safety, availability, aesthetics, practicality and costs
Testing – how well does the prototype meet design brief specifications and solve the identified problem?
Modifications – changes to the original prototype to improve testing results
Market Research – does the end prototype meet user expectations?
Conclusions – directly linked to the end point market research and testing results
Focusing and Planning
Collection of background material leading to an hypothesis, aim or testable question
The development of a method that tests the hypothesis
An outline of the method used to investigate the hypothesis
Carrying out an investigation
Tabulated raw data
Amendments to the draft method that have been made during the investigation
Interpretation of data
A statement of findings
Collection of background material that assists in correlating the findings to established scientific knowledge
A research exhibit comprises selected information to give a factual account of relevant scientific ideas, concepts or theories; data collection and reporting. The research process may be recorded and presented in a log book which could be included with the exhibit for the Judges to look at.
The research findings should be in the format of a scientific report that has:
A title
A clearly stated purpose or focus question.
An introduction or abstract that summarises the intent and findings of the research
Separate sections and sub-sections, each with a heading, that address the different parts of the research findings.
A conclusion that presents the research findings
A list of references in a systematic format that makes them accessible to readers
